NABOKV-L post 0017590, Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:06:25 -0800

Subject
Re: EDNote: responses to Schneider's "review"
Date
Body
You can in fact leave comments on the site. I myself did so.

--- On Mon, 1/12/09, Nabokv-L <nabokv-l@UTK.EDU> wrote:

From: Nabokv-L <nabokv-l@UTK.EDU>
Subject: [NABOKV-L] EDNote: responses to Schneider's "review"
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Date: Monday, January 12, 2009, 12:43 PM


I've received a number of postings responding to Schneider's "review" of Lolita.  I am not going to forward them, because it seems to me that the best place for such responses is on the blog site itself, if it accepts comments; I do not believe that Ms. Schneider is a NAB-L subscriber.  I think most readers here will agree that the review does not reflect a very careful or deep reading of Lolita, and its superficiality doesn't really earn it any attention on the list--unless we want to analyze it as a pop-culture reflection of Nabokov's art.  Remember, please, that many of these "submissions" are merely found things, out in the world--not statements made directly to this readership.  Our general policy is not to post expressions of disgust with or objection to the content of such found items.
~SB




Search the archive
Contact the Editors
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"

Visit Zembla
View Nabokv-L Policies
Manage subscription options
All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.

Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en

Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal:" http://www.nabokovonline.com

Manage subscription options: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/