Vladimir Nabokov

NABOKV-L post 0015022, Tue, 6 Mar 2007 19:00:07 +0000

Subject
Re: S.S. re: E. Darwin's poem
Date
Body
On 3/3/07 20:50, "Nabokv-L" <nabokv-l@UTK.EDU> wrote:

>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [NABOKV-L] E. Darwin's poem: CHW to JF
> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 15:06:48 +0100 (CET)
> From: soloviev@irit.fr
> To: Vladimir Nabokov Forum <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
> <mailto:NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
> References: <bf8.11ad0b64.3319e392@aol.com>
> <mailto:bf8.11ad0b64.3319e392@aol.com>
> Dear Charles,
>
> //snipski
> The aim of this posting is not to discuss the poetic quality of the PF,
> but to ask, what other
> works containing important parts written in verse and in prose we could
> compare with PF? And how the quality of verse part (seen as poetry)
> influenced the quality of the whole?
>
> Dear List: depending on how you define Œwork¹ and Œauthorship,¹ one that
> springs to mind is the Hebrew Bible, although the format of the majestic KJV
> does not always indicate which parts were Œpoetic¹ in the original. Note how
> inappropriate it has become to use the adjective Œprosaic¹ when wanting to
> contrast prose with poetry.
>
> A recent TIMEs editorial discussing the TOP TEN BEST BOOKS OF ALL TIME
> lamented that the Bible Œcame in well behind Lolita.¹
>
> skb 41-7


Search the archive: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/archives/nabokv-l.html
Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en

Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm







Attachment