As usual, the
arguments of the adepts of "multiple personality theory"
seem to me shaky - Carolyn is known to be a master of provoctive
arguments,
Jansy, being a psychoanalyst follows gladly, Matt fells to the old
temptation again...
>From Carolyn to the List,
I am more than a little disturbed by these remarks by a List member. I
don't think they should have been allowed, but since they have been,
let me just state my protest.
Carolyn
EDNote--Duly noted: I interpreted these remarks to be friendly in
intent, if "provocative" in their own right; I certainly hope I wasn't
wrong. All are encouraged to police their own language for possible
insensitivity and--just as important--to assume the best intentions in
the language of our sparring partners, if at all possible. And by all
means be sure to continue keeping me honest! As a rule, it is probably
best, as Carolyn suggests, to avoid sweeping characterizations of one
another's thought and arguments on-list.~SB