B.Boyd: I would reply to the Discovery Institute were it really interested in open debate and facts rather than a priori convictions that (as I have pointed out elsewhere) Nabokov's assumption that mimicry exceeds predators' powers of deception* has been falsified.
LH: (*I suppose you mean "powers of appreciation"?)

JM: Following LH's indication, in B.Boyd (ch4,  N's Ada, page 71 on SM 124-5): "when a protective device was carried to a point of mimetic subtlety, exuberance, and luxury far in excess of a predator's power of appreciation.
 
What strikes me in this debate is the fact that Man was not considered a predator! A dangerous one, under all accounts, whose powers of appreciation are equal to his powers of deception...
 
[Btw: I only just remembered a coincidence: several thirty years ago I followed  the work of another Boyd,  I.A.Boyd (!), on muscle spindles and evolutionary links bt. reptiles and lower mammals.]  
Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options

All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.