Subject:
Re: [NABOKV-L] THOUGHTS Re: Einstein and Langevin
From:
joseph Aisenberg <vanveen13@sbcglobal.net>
Date:
Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
To:
Vladimir Nabokov Forum <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>



Before outstaying my welcome, this Planck Time, being the theoretically smallest measurable interval, presents us with the QUANTUM view of time as DISCONTINUOUS. Stan Kelly-Bootle.
 
J.A.: My Layman's mind, along with Friedman's help, thinks it may have understood about a third of what you discussed. Over the years I've plunked through several books about quantum physics because friends of mind insisted that it verified the possibility of magic and other stuff that of course turned out not to be the case, but I did get stuck on this time issue. When you say time can be discontinuous, obviously this must have to do with something other than what I will call real clock time (I recall reading about particles going backwards or forwards or something, meaning that time had been trumped or whatever), since its continuity, the sensation of passage, is really based on perceptual memory and if it became discontinous then time would be meaningless. Time is only a measuring device we use with our memories to correlate changes in space. People like myself who understand little or no science often get the idea that The Time Travelers are coming! from our shallow exposure to the Quantum revolution.
Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options

All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.