For what it is worth, I have not in the least been convinced by Mr Maar's endeavours. I view it as an addition to that long list of articles striving to point out "possible sources" for VN's novel either in his readings or putative leanings. For me, the true riddle is these uncessant critical attempts that seem to overlook or underrate this writer's genius.
 
A. Bouazza
-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir Nabokov Forum [mailto:NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU]On Behalf Of Donald B. Johnson
Sent: 01 September 2005 20:43
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Subject: Fwd: Re: Michael Maar's evidence on the Lolita/Lichberg issue.

What makes VN´s putative use  to certain aspects of minor Lichberg´s opus so disturbing?
> Jansy


Dear Jansy,

I have been vainly waiting for the cries of outrage to erupt against the publication of Michael Maar's book on Nabokov and the von Lichberg "Lolita." I'm still waiting. Does this silence mean the critics no longer care? or that they have become used to the idea? or that they even accept the possibility? or that the discouraging P-word hasn't reared it's ugly head?

I have sent Michael Maar my congratulations on the publication of his book and wish him well with his endeavors.

Carolyn