According to the specialists,
http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a5_266.html
"....Lewis Carroll himself got bugged about this so much that he was moved to write the following in the preface to the 1896 edition of his book:
Enquiries have been so often addressed to me, as to whether any answer to the Hatter's Riddle can be imagined, that I may as well put on record here what seems to me to be a fairly appropriate answer, viz: `Because it can produce a few notes, tho they are very flat; and it is never put with the wrong end in front!' This, however, is merely an afterthought; the Riddle, as originally invented, had no answer at all.
Did this discourage people? No. They figured, that dope Carroll, he's too dumb to figure out his own riddle, setting aside the halfhearted attempt just quoted. So they ventured answers of their own, some of the more notable of which are recorded in Martin Gardner's The Annotated Alice and More Annotated Alice:
Not bad for amateurs. But the real answer, to which the careers of Poe and Carroll bear ample testimony, is that you can baffle the billions with both.
Postscript: In 1976 Carroll admirer Denis Crutch pointed out that in the 1896 preface quoted above, the author had originally written: "It is nevar put with the wrong end in front." Nevar of course is raven spelled backward. Big joke! However, said joke did not survive the ministrations of the proofreaders, who, thinking they understood the author's intentions better than the author, changed nevar to never in subsequent editions. The indignities we authors suffer! Sure, it's partly made up for by the money and groupies, but still, if in some book (e.g., this one) you come across a line that really clanks, be assured: it was funny before."
Subject: | Re: [NABOKV-L] monte-fonte |
---|---|
Date: | Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:42:22 +0100 |
From: | skb@bootle.biz |
To: | Vladimir Nabokov Forum <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU> |
References: | <44DA280D.7060200@utk.edu> |
Jansy: switching the first letters of noun-pairs has generated a dedicated
corpus of weak quips with the template "What's the difference between X and
Y?"
What's the difference between a goldfish and a goat?"
The goldfish mucks around the fountain.
Note the payoff line is usually omitted -- you are left to deduce what the goat
does. Is it fanciful to suppose VN was familiar with such wordplay?
The difference between a Russian detective and a sex-maniac?
The former is a Rostov Tec.
skb