Mary Krimmel wrote:
"Of course he could have his hands clasped, or he could be covering his ears, or massaging his neck. What difference does it make? The bed's untidy and the man could be seen, his trousers and elbows could be seen, but likely not much else about his position. No reason to say what is probably not even knowable to someone looking at the windows."

But it does make a difference and the writing makes us think through all these cinematic possibilities.  It made me experiment to confirm where my elbows would be in different positions, and made me more aware of elbows and how they can appear.  My theory that the man has his hands over his face and the other possibilities, such as wings (in case his elbows are out to the side and not sticking up at a right angle to his lying supine) present different images and meanings that enrich reading the text.  (And putting on a necklace and taking off a necklace require elbows to be less in motion, to respond I think to Jansy Mello, than the need for the elbows to be very still while the fingers are in motion during this "activity" in time of clasping or unclasping.  Clasping and unclasping relate also to twitching, a word that was used twice in "Signs and Symbols"--the unfledged bird in a puddle (shimmering iridescence again--nacreous) and the father's hands.)

Barrie Karp

Search the Nabokv-L archive with Google

Contact the Editors

All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.

Visit Zembla

View Nabokv-L Policies