Dear List,
Informations in "Ada, or Ardor" sometimes lead me into opposite lines of conjectures and often the paradox or the traps escape my conscious attention. Today I decided to share my curiosity with you and learn if other readers share this kind of puzzlement, or if it operates only with absendminded readers, like me.
It is well established that Van and Ada are brother and sister.
If anyone quizzed me about when and where they discovered that they were siblings, I'd answer that it happened while they were in Ardis, investigating together the attic.
We read, for example: " A girl was born on July 21, 1872, at
Ardis, her putative father’s seat in
We
have the suggestion that this was the first time the two had confronted
together the issue of their birthdates and
fatherhood: "The two young discoverers of that strange and
sickening treasure commented upon it as follows: ‘I deduce,’ said the boy, ‘three main facts: that not yet married
Marina and her married sister hibernated in my lieu de naissance; that
And yet, in the next breath and line Ada adds: " — an allusion, which your father, who, according to Blanche, is also mine, would understand like this’ (American finger-snap)."
So we see that many servants, Blanche included - and Ada herself - already knew of this little secret long before Ada and Van climbed up to the attic. It was clearly something that only Van ignored while he (as usual) went off onto a side issue ( which will never, really, be a "side issue" anyway).
Did Ada's words, as they were placed in her mouth at that moment, reveal that there were never "two" discoverers of strange treasures but only one? It this a "delayed-action" information deliberately set by the narrator and to what purpose does it serve?