To  R S Gwynn:

 

    I found this excerpt from a piece written by an 18 year old girl.  The entire article, in my opinion as a non-academic, was one of the best I have read.  It is a biographical presentment, titled:  The Nabokovian Aesthetic Bliss and its Invocations.  The young lady's web name is simply,   thatsanicecoat.  This might give you a starting place.

Some believe Lolita to be an allegory of the writer and his art, “Old Europe debauching young America”, or “Young American debauching Old Europe”. However, it was self-professed that Nabokov detested allegories and symbols (Nabokov... The Annotated, 314). In the same way, Nabokov also dismissed cliches, saying, in effect, “Because cliches trivialize, betray or deny the uniqueness of the thought, memory or perception struggling to find expression, they are finally an affront to consciousness itself,” (Quennell, 26). Many accused Nabokov, this lover of beauty, of creating “sheer unrestrained pornography”. While this might have some ground if the accuser merely understands the premise of the novel, the opening line destroys this theory as Lolita comments on the abuse of power and literature itself. The novel is professed to be a “powerfully ironic parody of cheap mass literature” (Oks, 50). In Nabokov’s essay, On a Book Entitled Lolita, he says, regarding its banned nature: