Just an odd correlation. It is well known that filmmaker David
Cronenberg is a huge fan of Nabokov. In fact he has often said that his
love of Nabokov turned him from becoming a writer since everything he wrote
ended up sounding like Nabokov. Transformation and dual identities are
familiar themes in Cronenberg’s work. In this 1992 article, Cronenberg
cites Pale Fire as his favorite book. One can’t help but think of at least
“The Fly” in the context of MR and TDR’s theory. Wonder what
Cronenberg would say…
http://www.davidcronenberg.de/lunchmaincfq.html
By the way, thanks to Matthew and Tiffany. I’m very much
enjoying the paper.
---Suellen
From: Vladimir Nabokov
Forum [mailto:NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU] On Behalf Of Matthew Roth
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 1:19 PM
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Subject: Re: [NABOKV-L] THOUGHTS: Roth/DeRewal article in NOJ
If I may, I would
like to say a word for my silent (list-wise) co-author Tiffany DeRewal. Tiffany
was a junior undergrad in my "Subversive Texts" topics class, in
which we read PF. As I recall, she formulated the basic outlines of the MPD
theory (which I had never considered) before even finishing her first full
reading of the novel. She is a movie buff and attributed the notion to her
recent viewing of "Fight Club" (which I still haven't seen, alas).
Anyway, I thought her theory had a lot of promise, and she eventually turned it
into a term paper and then, the following year, a Senior Honors thesis, which I
advised. (By this time I had discovered Nabokv-L and Carolyn's similar theory.)
After that, we worked together to write what you now have in front of you.
Tiffany has moved on to grad school, where, word is, she is reconstructing
Melville in equally outrageous fashion. We will hear more from her, I'm
sure.
Thanks to Jim Twiggs
for the kind words and rich insights.
Matt
Roth
All private editorial communications, without exception, are
read by both co-editors.