Dear List,
[SIGHTING] While investigating
links about Nabokov and chess, in the media, I found a reference ( I don't know
it it has been brought up before since it's older than most of you
participants...) to an article by Georg Steiner, in
the "Books" section of The New Yorker, sep 07, 1968.
The title is " A death of
Kings."
The query lies at the end. The intervening paragraphs
are a rough précis of Steiner's text.
[ Rough abstract and comments]
Steiner dwells on the issue of chess as a
"monomania" and describes how this game affects all true chess-players, who
find in it a "reality" more convincing and
fulfilling than "external reality" (or "internal reality," I must
add).
He compares the precocious and mysterious
"spacial" ability of young mathematicians, musicians and chess-players. He
dwells on Nabokov's KQK and various other novels of his that would have
been structured by a chess-player's ability to foresee
invisible moves, which are already a given once the play has begun.
He observes that Amis' article about VN's novels and chess didn't make any
reference to "The Luzhin Defense.
Interestingly, he describes how the player gets
divided in two, like a "schizophrenic," because he mentally plays
on both sides at the same time, delving into the "harmonious and melodic,
logical and necessary argument which derives from a initial tonal relation or
the preliminary fragments of a theme"** although he returns to his own, always
keeping the intent to win, ie, to survive*. Georg Steiner's title seems to be inspired by a poem written by
Yeats (Deirdre) and the "kingly death" which ignores physical extermination
to dwell in the eternal dimension achieved thru chess. A player feels "a shiver
in the spine," he addsm as soon as he spots a chess-set, he experiences "an
autistic uplifting"** as pure as one of "Bach's inverted canons or
Euler's polyhedron formula." For him, chess, pure math and music are
"resplendently useless," as if their practitioners "were building against the
world." engendering the "paradox of a triviality that is wholy
important."
I liked the conclusion proffered by Steiner
about "building against the world," once external reality ceases to be the
arbiter.
There's in it so much Nabokov in his
explicit comments during some of his interviews, his word-play
with "mir/mirage." aso.
And yet, until now, I had only considered
Nabokov's "alternate worlds", "parallel realities" without considering this
aggressive defiance related to the world as it is. If I remember it right, Nabokov never included chess among his
greatest ecstasies ( I remember mostly his description of standing in a field
with a net in his hand and being surrounded by butterflies).
[QUERY] When Steiner wrote that
there are constant allegoric associations bt chess and death, he mentions
medieval wood-cuts, Rennaissance frescoes, Cocteau and Bergman movies. He adds
that "Death wins the game although, while playing it must submit, even
if only momentarily, to rules that are totally outside its
control."** These lines reminded me of something Kinbote wrote,
attributing them to Shade's variants
and Alexander Pope: were these lines really written by Pope
("victim falters, victor fails.")? Can anyone help me to locate them?***
.....................................
* Cf. Nabokov's later writings (ADA)on the
differences bt. Terra and Antiterra: "there were those who retorted that the dissimilarities only
confirmed the live organic reality pertaining to the other world; that a perfect
likeness would rather suggest a specular, and hence speculatory, phenomenon; and
that two chess games with identical openings and identical end moves might
ramify in an infinite number of variations, on one board and in two
brains, at any middle stage of their irrevocably converging
development."
** I could not get an enlarged
copy from the digital TNY to copy quotes from the original. I bring a
re-translation obtained in another language, one which was readable asfter
being printed out.
*** - "Lines 895-899: The more I weigh... [ ]
Instead of these facile and revolting lines, the draft gives:
895 I
have a certain liking, I admit,/ For Parody, that last resort of
wit:/ "In nature’s strife when fortitude prevails/ The victim falters
and the victor fails./ 899 Yes, reader,
Pope."