In my opinion John Updike became a bit of a hack in his later years, while VN's writing improved.

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:41 AM, NABOKV-L <NABOKV-L@holycross.edu> wrote:
Dear List Members,

I've been thinking of writing an essay about what might be called Nabokov Derangement Syndrome. Which I would loosely define as the not-well examined phenomenon of good, even great writers not being aware of the envy beneath their disparaging remarks about VN.

  One could see it in those who denounced <Laura> for being published at all, because itwould be unfair to VN's memory to expose a not fully realized work to the world. And then when published, pounced on it as not being fully realized. They were clearly elated to have some grounds to feel superior momentarily to someone who was superior in finished work. .  Now I'm not one to call VN perfect, but I recently came across quotes from Updike and Geoff Dyer (I believe they were quoted in reviews republished on this list) whom I've admired, taking shots at VN and his admirers.

  It must be galling to be a writer of fiction and forever be condemned to be second (at least) to VN, so it's not surprising, but I don't think the Syndrome's been pointed out, so I'd be grateful for examples.

     Thank you,

     Ron Rosenbaum

Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options

All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.




--
Norky
Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options

All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.