In a previous post about authors who constructed worlds that seemed to
invalidate Nabokov's claim in LATH [ie: "[n]obody can
imagine in physical terms the act of reversing the order of time. Time is not
reversible."], Philip K. Dick's Counter-Clock World (1967) and
Martin Amis's Time's Arrow (1991) were cited. Reversed time narratives
were distinguished from "narratives that tell stories in reverse chronological
order" by M-L Ryan (2009), who left out of her considerations Nabokov's
permanent interest in reversions, hereafter and chronophobia as we find
them being presented in "Ada", "Speak, Memory," and in several of his other
writings as well.
By coincidence, Stan K-Bootle put me in
touch with another kind of punch line*:
"There was a young
lady called Bright
Who could travel much faster than light.
She set out
one day
In a relative way
And returned on the previous
night"
but not even naughty Laura in TOoL manages such a feat. Ada seems to
get close to this idea when, after years of separation, she meets Van and
her "solitary and precipitate advance consumed in reverse
all the years of their separation as she changed from a dark-glittering stranger
with the high hair-do in fashion to the pale-armed girl in black who had always
belonged to him." However, this transformation is merely
taking place in the narrator's mind and it follows a process that
lies close to the Freudian transferential "re-edition of the past." (a central
issue for psychoanalytic theories and practice).
In "ADA"
there's a whimsical succession of wordplaying that verges on
echolalia: "Allied to the professional and vocational
dreams are ‘dim-doom’ visions: fatidic-sign nightmares, thalamic calamities,
menacing riddles. Not infrequently the menace is well concealed, and the
innocent incident will turn out to possess, if jotted down and looked up later,
the kind of precognitive flavor that Dunne has explained by the action of
‘reverse memory’; but for the moment I am not going to enlarge upon the uncanny
element particular to dreams — beyond observing that some law of logic should
fix the number of coincidences, in a given domain, after which they cease to be
coincidences, and form, instead, the living organism of a new truth."
Nevertheless, in a totally different mood, Van could
recognize his mental automatisms and, not very successfully, try
to "uncurl out of an indefinitely lengthy trance, and
note with wonder that the ship was going the other way or that the order of his
left-hand fingers was reversed, now beginning, clockwise, with his thumb as on
his right hand, or that the marble Mercury that had been looking over his
shoulder had been transformed into an attentive arborvitae. He would realize all
at once that three, seven, thirteen years, in one cycle of separation, and then
four, eight, sixteen, in yet another, had elapsed since he had last embraced,
held, bewept Ada...Numbers and rows and series — the nightmare and malediction
harrowing pure thought and pure time — seemed bent on mechanizing his
mind."
Van often swerves, subreptitiously, to go against
the hateful Signy Mondieu Mondieu and when he insists on the
prevalence of a deliberate operation that can efficaciously put the
past in reverse gear: "In the same sense of
individual, perceptual time, I can put my Past in reverse gear, enjoy this
moment of recollection as much as I did the horn of abundance whose stucco
pineapple just missed my head, and postulate that next moment a cosmic or
corporeal cataclysm might — not kill me, but plunge me into a permanent state of
stupor, of a type sensationally new to science, thus depriving natural
dissolution of any logical or chronal sense."
The same themes discussed in LATH seem to constitute ADA's
alchemical corpus: "My aim was to compose a kind of
novella in the form of a treatise on the Texture of Time, an investigation of
its veily substance, with illustrative metaphors gradually increasing, very
gradually building up a logical love story, going from past to present,
blossoming as a concrete story, and just as gradually reversing analogies and
disintegrating again into bland abstraction.." **
................................................
*- Arthur
Buller in Punch, 19 Dec. 1923.
** - Although Nabokov takes his time to rally against
Einstein's Relativity Theory and time-space, most often he has in
mind narratological time and fiction. Here is another example which
departs fromVan's maniambulations and leads to his "standing of a metaphor on its head not for the sake of the trick’s
difficulty, but in order to perceive an ascending waterfall or a sunrise in
reverse: a triumph, in a sense, over the ardis of time." Unfortunately
for me, I haven't yet really grasped its objective non-poetic meaning.
More about that subject can be read in the fascinating
collection "Timescapes" (edited by Peter Haining, 1997, by Souvenir
Press, GB). Or in the works of Cortázar and JL Borges...
.