In Pale Fire John Shade sees humanity as having been most
"artistically caged" by mysterious
powers, whereas Charles Kinbote considers that cage as
being constituted by one's physical body, bourgeois
morality and a person's symptomatic determinants: "With no Providence the soul must rely on the dust
of its husk, on the experience gathered in the course of corporeal confinement,
and cling childishly to small-town principles, local by-laws and a personality
consisting mainly of the shadows of its own prison bars. Such an idea is not to
be entertained one instant by the religious mind." In Nabokov's later novel, Ada, or
Ardor, a bird-cage is also brought up: "Had it really happened? Are we
really free? Certain caged birds, say Chinese amateurs shaking with
fatman mirth, knock themselves out against the bars (and lie unconscious for a
few minutes) every blessed morning, right upon awakening, in an automatic,
dream-continuing, dreamlined dash — although they are, those iridescent
prisoners, quite perky and docile and talkative the rest of the
time."
For Leland de La Durantaye (Kafka's Reality and Nabokov's Fantasy. On
Dwarves, Saints, Beetles, Symbolism, and Genius), Nabokov's
"first throb" of Lolita is brought up in connection to Franz
Kafka's jailed animals:
"In 1920, Kafka's friend Gustav Janouch brought him an English
book, David Garnett's Lady into Fox, which Janouch denounced as having copied
the methods Kafka had invented in The Metamorphosis. Kafka immediately
rejected the idea: "he did not copy that from me—it is part of our times. We
both copied it. Animals are closer to us than men. Those are the bars of the
cage." A week later, Kafka returned to the idea in his talks with Janouch: "each
of us lives behind bars that we carry with us wherever we go. This is why there
is so much writing about animals. It is an expression of the desire for a free
and natural life" (Janouch 43). What Kafka wished to express through his insect
and the rest of his animal menagerie was that modern life and language carried
their own bars—and ones not easily pulled down. The ape of "A Report to the
Academy," the beetle of "The Metamorphosis," the mice of "Josephine the Singer,"
the dog of "The Investigations of a Dog," and the other enigmatic creatures in
Kafka's works, all express a longing for 'a free and natural life'."
[...] "In his afterword to Lotita Nabokov employs this same figure of
an animal (an ape) in a cage to describe the moment of inspiration that preceded
his writing of that work: "The first little throb of
Lolita went through me late in 1939 or early in 1940, in Paris, at a time when I
was laid up with a severe attack of intercostal neuralgia. As far as I can
recall, the initial shiver of inspiration was somehow prompted by a newspaper
story about an ape in the Jardin des Plantes, who, after months of coaxing by a
scientist, produced the first drawing ever charcoaled by an animal: this sketch
showed the bars of the poor creature's cage" (Annotated Lolita 311).
This article has never been found, and there is every reason to believe that
Nabokov invented it for the occasion."
In Kafka's stories the animal is usually impelled forward and
forced to evolve (as the caged ape in "A report to the Academy") or
it must advance hopelessly toward its doom since any change
of direction is equally mortiferous (cf. the cat and mouse
in "A Little Fable"). All of them (not only human characters)
must face a dead-end and learn that there's no way out from their
present predicament. Civilized life offers no escape into freedom.
Reconsidering Kinbote's words ("...a personality
consisting mainly of the shadows of its own prison bars") under the light
of Kafka's little parables I began to think that
Lolita's caged artistic ape and Humbert Humbert's prison
bars give shape to the pedophile's tragic dimension, should we
accept the hypothesis that Humbert Humbert's cage is his
personality, his illness. Because they can only access HH's
posthumous confessions, Lolita readers have
to realize how useless it is for
HH to address an imaginary jury. Like it happens
with Kafka's characters, HH sits "Before the Law" and there is no
one to condemn or to forgive him, while he's still living. There is no way
out of his condition. There's no hope.
Perhaps we can stretch the related images of Kafka's and
Nabokov's cage-bars in Lolita a little further. We may look
at Pale Fire's Hazel Shade while she is
standing outside the azure entrance of a bar, with its
neon-barred puddles (lines 397-400). The equivocally significant words
"bar/neon-bar" are 'unpoetically' placed close together (perhaps
this is why while riding a bus Hazel holds onto a "stang,"
instead of any "bar" or post). Perhaps the word "bar" in that
instance serves to emphasize the hopelessness of her romantic situation
and how emprisioned she feels by her "Hazelhood." (I'm placing my
trust on Kinbote's observations!).
If there's any freedom
and hope left, it's up to her father to explore and
to recover.
.