I will gladly answer to Jansy and anyone else off-list.
Sterility is a possible biological consequence of
consanguineous
inbreeding.
See e.g.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19367331
Victor Fet
From: Vladimir Nabokov Forum [mailto:NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU]
On Behalf Of Jansy Mello
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 10:25 PM
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Subject: [NABOKV-L] RES: [NABOKV-L] Darwin in Ada
V.Fet:
I am attempting to explore importance of Darwin in Ada and other VN writings (beyond Podvig/Glory).
I am not specifically interested in "Scrabble approach", but noticed
that both Demon and Dan Veen have nicknames starting with R, and thus abbreviate to D. "R". Veen, or in Russian transliteration, D. R. Vin.
(English "R" is read as "ar").
Note hard "v" with which we Russians
customarily replace "w" in spoken English (e.g. I live in Vest Wirginia)./Their grandfather is Erasmus Veen, who is easily interpreted as Erasmus [Dar]vin./I wonder if anybody noticed this word play before.
I welcome any advice
on the subject./
Van and Ada thus are not just "children of Demon" but also descendants of Darwin./"Descent with modification" is Darwin's original formula of evolutionary
change. Anybody would agree that, in the case of Van and Ada, such modification, compared to direct ancestors, is profound.
It will not be inherited, I am afraid.
Jansy: Dear Vest Wirginian Professor,
For the first time I
saw
a clue about VN's
insistence on Van's (biological) sterility. What are the
“profound modifications” you find in them, probably enhanced by their parents close family ties?
I remember that there’s a reference to
Wallace
(in a spiritualist session) in “Pale Fire” but I never found any easy indication of Spencer (I’m mainly considering
his approach to “morality in nature”).
Why do you think VN would be
more exclusively
interested in Darwin? Would the play with D.”R” Veen be indicative of “recessive traits”?
I’m daring to ask you these amateurish questions because I would like to learn more about
those subtle clues, like the one you seem to have discovered just now, and to what
they might
be pointing at?
All private editorial communications are read by both co-editors.