Subject
teaching Lolita
From
Date
Body
From HP to PH...those curious reversed "spider-redips" we so often come across without realizing we'd been looking at things from the opposite side of a bridge... AB's yesterday's lines about "teaching Lolita" made me realize why it seemed impossible to say anything on this subject. Why English explorers love the desert and those that live in them dream with the oasis...
I'm not an English teacher nor do I belong to any department of literature in America, England,France or Brazil but, over the last thirty years, I taught psychology and psychoanalysis and clinical cases ( begining with Freud's Schreber, Hans, Dora, Emma, and those my students brought up for discussion). These were never "fiction", as it happens with "Lolita", "LATH" or "Hamlet".
Whenever I imagined myself "teaching Lolita" as a work of art my interest wouldn't focus on Humbert Humbert's perversion and paedophilia, moral and psychological issues or some such themes, neither on Nabokov's own "refusal" in relation to Freud. I would explore his poetical images, his words, his enigmas, or the importance of what VN described as the "lilting luminous letter L" as synesthaesia gaining shape in art...
If I should teach Lolita I would work on themes like: "First Love" or "Love as a form of Madness" since this novel is, above everyting else, a wonderful tragic love story. I would let psychiatrists, sociologists and moralists worry about the rest!
Jansy
Search the archive: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/archives/nabokv-l.html
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
I'm not an English teacher nor do I belong to any department of literature in America, England,France or Brazil but, over the last thirty years, I taught psychology and psychoanalysis and clinical cases ( begining with Freud's Schreber, Hans, Dora, Emma, and those my students brought up for discussion). These were never "fiction", as it happens with "Lolita", "LATH" or "Hamlet".
Whenever I imagined myself "teaching Lolita" as a work of art my interest wouldn't focus on Humbert Humbert's perversion and paedophilia, moral and psychological issues or some such themes, neither on Nabokov's own "refusal" in relation to Freud. I would explore his poetical images, his words, his enigmas, or the importance of what VN described as the "lilting luminous letter L" as synesthaesia gaining shape in art...
If I should teach Lolita I would work on themes like: "First Love" or "Love as a form of Madness" since this novel is, above everyting else, a wonderful tragic love story. I would let psychiatrists, sociologists and moralists worry about the rest!
Jansy
Search the archive: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/archives/nabokv-l.html
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm