Subject
Fw: pynchon-l-digest V2 #3521
From
Date
Body
----- Original Message -----
From: "pynchon-l-digest" <owner-pynchon-l-digest@waste.org>
To: <pynchon-l-digest@waste.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 12:00 AM
Subject: pynchon-l-digest V2 #3521
>
> pynchon-l-digest Sunday, August 31 2003 Volume 02 : Number
3521
>
>
> Re: NPPF Comm 2: Parents: some notes
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 16:52:17 +1000
> From: jbor <jbor@bigpond.com>
> Subject: Re: NPPF Comm 2: Parents: some notes
>
> on 31/8/03 3:09 PM, Don Corathers at gumbo@fuse.net wrote:
>
> > The inclusion of Botkin in a list of names where it doesn't really fit
> > (three writers--four counting Luke--and a shoemaker) is a way of
pointing at
> > the name. Nabokov does this now and then, makes an odd intrusion or has
one
> > of his characters say we shouldn't concern ourselves with X, which is
> > usually a clear signal that we should check X out very carefully.
> >
> > And the paragraph is about how names change.
>
> Your thesis doesn't really seem to fit with the other mentions of Botkin
> which Kinbote makes in the commentary; Lukin, Locock, Luxon and
Lukashevich
> aren't names which refer to writers; and the paragraph actually begins and
> concludes with references to Hurley's obituary; but I won't labour the
> argument.
>
> We'll just have to agree to disagree.
>
> best
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of pynchon-l-digest V2 #3521
> ********************************
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to waste@waste.org
> with "unsubscribe pynchon-l-digest" in the message body.
From: "pynchon-l-digest" <owner-pynchon-l-digest@waste.org>
To: <pynchon-l-digest@waste.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2003 12:00 AM
Subject: pynchon-l-digest V2 #3521
>
> pynchon-l-digest Sunday, August 31 2003 Volume 02 : Number
3521
>
>
> Re: NPPF Comm 2: Parents: some notes
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 16:52:17 +1000
> From: jbor <jbor@bigpond.com>
> Subject: Re: NPPF Comm 2: Parents: some notes
>
> on 31/8/03 3:09 PM, Don Corathers at gumbo@fuse.net wrote:
>
> > The inclusion of Botkin in a list of names where it doesn't really fit
> > (three writers--four counting Luke--and a shoemaker) is a way of
pointing at
> > the name. Nabokov does this now and then, makes an odd intrusion or has
one
> > of his characters say we shouldn't concern ourselves with X, which is
> > usually a clear signal that we should check X out very carefully.
> >
> > And the paragraph is about how names change.
>
> Your thesis doesn't really seem to fit with the other mentions of Botkin
> which Kinbote makes in the commentary; Lukin, Locock, Luxon and
Lukashevich
> aren't names which refer to writers; and the paragraph actually begins and
> concludes with references to Hurley's obituary; but I won't labour the
> argument.
>
> We'll just have to agree to disagree.
>
> best
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of pynchon-l-digest V2 #3521
> ********************************
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to waste@waste.org
> with "unsubscribe pynchon-l-digest" in the message body.