NABOKV-L post 0007146, Sat, 23 Nov 2002 19:33:52 -0800

Subject
Fw: Fw: Ck replies to Jerry Friedman
Date
Body
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Brown" <as-brown@comcast.net>
To: "Vladimir Nabokov Forum" <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Ck replies to Jerry Friedman


>
> ----------------- Message requiring your approval (36
lines) ------------------
> I retract the final sentence of my post, a rhetorical error and clearly a
> comment my argument would have been better off without, and stand by the
> rest.
>
> AB
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "D. Barton Johnson" <chtodel@cox.net>
> To: <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
> Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 12:11 PM
> Subject: Fw: Fw: Ck replies to Jerry Friedman
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "s~Z" <keithsz@concentric.net>
> > To: "Vladimir Nabokov Forum" <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
> > Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:11 PM
> > Subject: Re: Fw: Ck replies to Jerry Friedman
> >
> >
> > >
> > > ----------------- Message requiring your approval (9
> > lines) -------------------
> > > >>>This is why Shade's choice of the word roommate has been accepted
> > without
> > > question for 40 years. Not because millions of readers around the
world
> > have
> > > missed a clue to Shade's presumed philandering nature.<<<
> > >
> > > If the 'roommate as co-ed' point could stand on its own merits it
> wouldn't
> > > have needed this load of argumentum ad populum here at the conclusion.
> > >
> > > Go CK.
> > >
>