Vladimir Nabokov

NABOKV-L post 0020036, Fri, 14 May 2010 16:43:52 -0300

Subject
Re: Fw: [NABOKV-L] THOUGHTS: the need for climax in Canto 4
From
Date
Body
In a message dated 13/05/2010 23:51:08 GMT Daylight Time, chtodel@COX.NET writes:Does it not seem apropos, that the missing final line (1000) is intended to mark the ultimate indeterminacy of the afterlife issue? It seems a fitting conclusion, no? Don Johnson / That is indeed what I have been trying to suggest.Anthony Stadlen

JM: Isn't this laying excessive emphasis on the linearity of after-life, its talking spirits in limbo, hell and paradise, and not as metaphors about being caged in time and space? What about Shade's hints at a transcendental dimension with its parallel, cohexisting worlds? Am I wrong to imagine that the entire "IPH" canto is a parody of spiritualistic rituals, institutionalized religious beliefs?



Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en

Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal:" http://www.nabokovonline.com

Manage subscription options: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/








Attachment