Subject
Re: QUERY: VN on Garnett's translation of Anna Karenin(a)
From
Date
Body
I believe this is a better tranlsation of Anna Karenin - by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky.
best, Vladimir Mylnikov
________________________________
From: NABOKV-L <NABOKV-L@HOLYCROSS.EDU>
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Sent: Fri, December 18, 2009 6:01:49 AM
Subject: [NABOKV-L] QUERY: VN on Garnett's translation of Anna Karenin(a)
As Fredson Bowers points out in his introduction to the Lectures on Russian Literature, VN "highly disapproved of Constance Garnett's translations from the Russian," including that of Anna Karenina - or rather, as Nabokov corrects the usual English title, Anna Karenin. Indeed, this volume's transcription of VN's lecture on the novel "usually omits his bitter sidenotes about the translator's incompetency, directed at Constance Garnett's blunders" (xv).
A subscriber asked me to forward this query to the List, especially to those who teach Russian literature in translation: Do you agree with VN's assessment of Garnett's translation? Which translation of Tolstoy's novel do you recommend instead?
Susan Elizabeth Sweeney
Co-Editor, NABOKV-L
Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options
All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.
Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal:" http://www.nabokovonline.com
Manage subscription options: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/
best, Vladimir Mylnikov
________________________________
From: NABOKV-L <NABOKV-L@HOLYCROSS.EDU>
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Sent: Fri, December 18, 2009 6:01:49 AM
Subject: [NABOKV-L] QUERY: VN on Garnett's translation of Anna Karenin(a)
As Fredson Bowers points out in his introduction to the Lectures on Russian Literature, VN "highly disapproved of Constance Garnett's translations from the Russian," including that of Anna Karenina - or rather, as Nabokov corrects the usual English title, Anna Karenin. Indeed, this volume's transcription of VN's lecture on the novel "usually omits his bitter sidenotes about the translator's incompetency, directed at Constance Garnett's blunders" (xv).
A subscriber asked me to forward this query to the List, especially to those who teach Russian literature in translation: Do you agree with VN's assessment of Garnett's translation? Which translation of Tolstoy's novel do you recommend instead?
Susan Elizabeth Sweeney
Co-Editor, NABOKV-L
Search the archive Contact the Editors Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla View Nabokv-L Policies Manage subscription options
All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.
Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal:" http://www.nabokovonline.com
Manage subscription options: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/