Subject
Re: EDNote: responses to Schneider's "review"
From
Date
Body
You can in fact leave comments on the site. I myself did so.
--- On Mon, 1/12/09, Nabokv-L <nabokv-l@UTK.EDU> wrote:
From: Nabokv-L <nabokv-l@UTK.EDU>
Subject: [NABOKV-L] EDNote: responses to Schneider's "review"
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Date: Monday, January 12, 2009, 12:43 PM
I've received a number of postings responding to Schneider's "review" of Lolita. I am not going to forward them, because it seems to me that the best place for such responses is on the blog site itself, if it accepts comments; I do not believe that Ms. Schneider is a NAB-L subscriber. I think most readers here will agree that the review does not reflect a very careful or deep reading of Lolita, and its superficiality doesn't really earn it any attention on the list--unless we want to analyze it as a pop-culture reflection of Nabokov's art. Remember, please, that many of these "submissions" are merely found things, out in the world--not statements made directly to this readership. Our general policy is not to post expressions of disgust with or objection to the content of such found items.
~SB
Search the archive
Contact the Editors
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla
View Nabokv-L Policies
Manage subscription options
All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.
Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal:" http://www.nabokovonline.com
Manage subscription options: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/
--- On Mon, 1/12/09, Nabokv-L <nabokv-l@UTK.EDU> wrote:
From: Nabokv-L <nabokv-l@UTK.EDU>
Subject: [NABOKV-L] EDNote: responses to Schneider's "review"
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Date: Monday, January 12, 2009, 12:43 PM
I've received a number of postings responding to Schneider's "review" of Lolita. I am not going to forward them, because it seems to me that the best place for such responses is on the blog site itself, if it accepts comments; I do not believe that Ms. Schneider is a NAB-L subscriber. I think most readers here will agree that the review does not reflect a very careful or deep reading of Lolita, and its superficiality doesn't really earn it any attention on the list--unless we want to analyze it as a pop-culture reflection of Nabokov's art. Remember, please, that many of these "submissions" are merely found things, out in the world--not statements made directly to this readership. Our general policy is not to post expressions of disgust with or objection to the content of such found items.
~SB
Search the archive
Contact the Editors
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal"
Visit Zembla
View Nabokv-L Policies
Manage subscription options
All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.
Search archive with Google:
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?q=site:listserv.ucsb.edu&HL=en
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
Visit "Nabokov Online Journal:" http://www.nabokovonline.com
Manage subscription options: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/