Subject
Re: A syllogism
From
Date
Body
This is the famous syllogism from Kiesewetter's (Johann Gottfried Karl Christian Kiesewetter, 1766-1819)Logic textbook (1791): "Caius is a man, men are mortal, therefore Caius is mortal" ("Caius" is Gaius Julius Caesar). As Sergey pointed out, this syllogism is important in Tolstoy's "The Death of Ivan Il'yich." But what he forgot to mention, is that in his essay "On Annensky" (1935) Vl. Khodasevich compares Ivan Ilyich Golovin (by the way, "Veen" seems to be a truncated, or, rather, "beheaded," form of "Golovin," meaning both the Tolstoy character and the real Ivan Golovin, 1816-1890, author of "Zapiski," Leipzig, 1859, referred to by Herzen in "Byloe i Dumy") to Annensky, whose penname (mentioned in Khodasevich's article) was "Nik. T-o" (see also Dolinin's earlier post to Nabokv-L). But "Nikto (b)" is reversed "Botkin" (as every List member surely knows by now)! Does it confirm that "Shade" (Russian ten' = net, "no") = nikto (b) = Botkin (e) = Kinbote?
Alexey Sklyarenko
----- Original Message -----
From: Sergey Karpukhin
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 3:31 AM
Subject: [NABOKV-L] A syllogism
A syllogism: other men die; but I
Am not another; therefore I'll not die. (l.213-4)
This could be a reference to Leo Tolstoy's "Death of Ivan Ilyich" (1886): All men die. Kay is a man. Therefore, Kay will die. But, thinks Ivan Ilyich, I'm not Kay; therefore, that doesn't apply to me. What may be true about all other men, is not necessarily true about me. The first part (about Kay) is an example of the type of syllogism called "Barbara" and Tolstoy probably took it from some textbook on logic (Bertrand Russell's example of "Barbara" cited in a chapter on Aristotle: All men are mortal; Socrates is a man; therefore, Socrates is mortal), but I don't have a good edition of Tolstoy's works with commentary at hand to confirm this.
Regards,
SK
Search the Nabokv-L archive at UCSB
Contact the Editors
All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.
Visit Zembla
View Nabokv-L Policies
Search the archive: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/archives/nabokv-l.html
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm
Alexey Sklyarenko
----- Original Message -----
From: Sergey Karpukhin
To: NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU
Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 3:31 AM
Subject: [NABOKV-L] A syllogism
A syllogism: other men die; but I
Am not another; therefore I'll not die. (l.213-4)
This could be a reference to Leo Tolstoy's "Death of Ivan Ilyich" (1886): All men die. Kay is a man. Therefore, Kay will die. But, thinks Ivan Ilyich, I'm not Kay; therefore, that doesn't apply to me. What may be true about all other men, is not necessarily true about me. The first part (about Kay) is an example of the type of syllogism called "Barbara" and Tolstoy probably took it from some textbook on logic (Bertrand Russell's example of "Barbara" cited in a chapter on Aristotle: All men are mortal; Socrates is a man; therefore, Socrates is mortal), but I don't have a good edition of Tolstoy's works with commentary at hand to confirm this.
Regards,
SK
Search the Nabokv-L archive at UCSB
Contact the Editors
All private editorial communications, without exception, are read by both co-editors.
Visit Zembla
View Nabokv-L Policies
Search the archive: http://listserv.ucsb.edu/archives/nabokv-l.html
Contact the Editors: mailto:nabokv-l@utk.edu,nabokv-l@holycross.edu
Visit Zembla: http://www.libraries.psu.edu/nabokov/zembla.htm
View Nabokv-L policies: http://web.utk.edu/~sblackwe/EDNote.htm