Subject
Fw: up in a heavel Lichberg LO
From
Date
Body
----- Original Message -----
From: "George Shimanovich" <gshiman@optonline.net>
> ----------------- Message requiring your approval (41
lines) ------------------
> Carolyn,
>
> I think those whom you refer to as 'so many' reject unconvincing proofs
that
> two German corresponents/professors/doctors presented. The maniac
insistence
> with which Lichberg's connections are pushed by so few ('The Leonardo',
> 'Cloud, Castle, Lake' are latest victims) while ignoring all reasoning to
> the oposite remind modern forms of political activism. And for better or
> worse (I think for better) this forum does not lend itself to that.
>
> If you have read Pushkin in Russian you will recognise these lines: "Mne
ne
> smeshno kogda figlyar prezrenny Mne pachkaet Madonnu Rafael'a". You told
> earlier that some view Nabokov as God. Well, to a degree that Gogol or
> Pushkin or Tolstoy or Kafka are Gods, Nabokov is. You get my drift.
>
> George Shimanovich
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "D. Barton Johnson" <chtodel@cox.net>
> To: <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:39 PM
> Subject: Fw: up in a heavel Lichberg LO
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Carolyn Kunin" <chaiselongue@earthlink.net>
> > > ----------------- Message requiring your approval (10
> > lines) ------------------
> > > Dear Members of the List,
> > >
> > > I don't understand why so many are so upset by the Maar discovery. Has
> he
> > > attacked Nabokov's -- what? purity?
> > >
> > > Maybe Nabokov read the earlier Lolita story, maybe he didn't. It seems
> to
> > me
> > > that more evidence may eventually turn up, now that we are looking for
> it.
> > > Why is this so problematic? Can't we just wait and see?
> > >
> > > Carolyn
>
From: "George Shimanovich" <gshiman@optonline.net>
> ----------------- Message requiring your approval (41
lines) ------------------
> Carolyn,
>
> I think those whom you refer to as 'so many' reject unconvincing proofs
that
> two German corresponents/professors/doctors presented. The maniac
insistence
> with which Lichberg's connections are pushed by so few ('The Leonardo',
> 'Cloud, Castle, Lake' are latest victims) while ignoring all reasoning to
> the oposite remind modern forms of political activism. And for better or
> worse (I think for better) this forum does not lend itself to that.
>
> If you have read Pushkin in Russian you will recognise these lines: "Mne
ne
> smeshno kogda figlyar prezrenny Mne pachkaet Madonnu Rafael'a". You told
> earlier that some view Nabokov as God. Well, to a degree that Gogol or
> Pushkin or Tolstoy or Kafka are Gods, Nabokov is. You get my drift.
>
> George Shimanovich
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "D. Barton Johnson" <chtodel@cox.net>
> To: <NABOKV-L@LISTSERV.UCSB.EDU>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 7:39 PM
> Subject: Fw: up in a heavel Lichberg LO
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Carolyn Kunin" <chaiselongue@earthlink.net>
> > > ----------------- Message requiring your approval (10
> > lines) ------------------
> > > Dear Members of the List,
> > >
> > > I don't understand why so many are so upset by the Maar discovery. Has
> he
> > > attacked Nabokov's -- what? purity?
> > >
> > > Maybe Nabokov read the earlier Lolita story, maybe he didn't. It seems
> to
> > me
> > > that more evidence may eventually turn up, now that we are looking for
> it.
> > > Why is this so problematic? Can't we just wait and see?
> > >
> > > Carolyn
>