Subject
Fw: pynchon-l-digest V2 #3560
From
Date
Body
----- Original Message -----
From: "pynchon-l-digest" <owner-pynchon-l-digest@waste.org>
To: <pynchon-l-digest@waste.org>
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 8:21 AM
Subject: pynchon-l-digest V2 #3560
>
> pynchon-l-digest Monday, September 22 2003 Volume 02 : Number
3560
>
>
>
> Re: NPPF Index
> Der fiktive Mensch
>> Re: NPPF Bear Range
> Re: NPPF Index
>
>
> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:20:15 +1000
> From: jbor <jbor@bigpond.com>
> Subject: Re: NPPF Index
>
> on 22/9/03 1:59 PM, Keith McMullen at keithsz@concentric.net wrote:
>
> > Why in the index are the letters G, K, and S (which see) said to be
standing
> > for the main characters, then when you 'see which,' you find entries for
G
> > and K, and none for S?
>
> Wha? There are a dozen or more under the entry foBearKinbote, Charles,
Dr*"
> and nearly as many under the entry for "*Shade, John*".
>
> There are only a couple for G, but they're there.
>
> best
>
> ------------------------------
>
> > >
> >
>> From: bekah <bekah0176@sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: NPPF Bera Range
>
> At 10:17 AM -0400 9/18/03, Jasper Fidget wrote:
> >What's going on with the PF read? Am I the only one left? Already?
>
>
> No.
>
> Bekah
> days late and dollars short,
> limping along anyway
> enjoying the ride
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 06:52:46 -0700
> From: "sZ" <keithsz@concentric.net>
> Subject: Re: NPPF Index
>
> > Why in the index are the letters G, K, and S (which see) said to be
> standing
> > for the main characters, then when you 'see which,' you find entries for
G
> > and K, and none for S?
>
> Wha? There are a dozen or more under the entry for "*Kinbote, Charles,
Dr*"
> and nearly as many under the entry for "*Shade, John*".
>
> >>>There are only a couple for G, but they're there.<<<
>
> There are specific entries for the *letter G* and *letter K.*
>
> There is no entry for the *letter S.*
>
> In the preface to the intro the list of letters is given followed by
(which
> see). When you follow this instruction to see each of the *letters* in the
> index you find one is missing. S is missing. Sure it is used under other
> entries. But, unlike G and K, it has no entry of its own.
>
> ------------------------------
>
>>
>>
> End of pynchon-l-digest V2 #3560
> ********************************
>
>.
From: "pynchon-l-digest" <owner-pynchon-l-digest@waste.org>
To: <pynchon-l-digest@waste.org>
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 8:21 AM
Subject: pynchon-l-digest V2 #3560
>
> pynchon-l-digest Monday, September 22 2003 Volume 02 : Number
3560
>
>
>
> Re: NPPF Index
> Der fiktive Mensch
>> Re: NPPF Bear Range
> Re: NPPF Index
>
>
> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 18:20:15 +1000
> From: jbor <jbor@bigpond.com>
> Subject: Re: NPPF Index
>
> on 22/9/03 1:59 PM, Keith McMullen at keithsz@concentric.net wrote:
>
> > Why in the index are the letters G, K, and S (which see) said to be
standing
> > for the main characters, then when you 'see which,' you find entries for
G
> > and K, and none for S?
>
> Wha? There are a dozen or more under the entry foBearKinbote, Charles,
Dr*"
> and nearly as many under the entry for "*Shade, John*".
>
> There are only a couple for G, but they're there.
>
> best
>
> ------------------------------
>
> > >
> >
>> From: bekah <bekah0176@sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: NPPF Bera Range
>
> At 10:17 AM -0400 9/18/03, Jasper Fidget wrote:
> >What's going on with the PF read? Am I the only one left? Already?
>
>
> No.
>
> Bekah
> days late and dollars short,
> limping along anyway
> enjoying the ride
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 06:52:46 -0700
> From: "sZ" <keithsz@concentric.net>
> Subject: Re: NPPF Index
>
> > Why in the index are the letters G, K, and S (which see) said to be
> standing
> > for the main characters, then when you 'see which,' you find entries for
G
> > and K, and none for S?
>
> Wha? There are a dozen or more under the entry for "*Kinbote, Charles,
Dr*"
> and nearly as many under the entry for "*Shade, John*".
>
> >>>There are only a couple for G, but they're there.<<<
>
> There are specific entries for the *letter G* and *letter K.*
>
> There is no entry for the *letter S.*
>
> In the preface to the intro the list of letters is given followed by
(which
> see). When you follow this instruction to see each of the *letters* in the
> index you find one is missing. S is missing. Sure it is used under other
> entries. But, unlike G and K, it has no entry of its own.
>
> ------------------------------
>
>>
>>
> End of pynchon-l-digest V2 #3560
> ********************************
>
>.