When Ada (now married to Andrey Vinelander) refuses to leave her ill husband, Van Veen (the narrator and main character in VN’s novel Ada, 1969) hopes that Andrey (who has tuberculosis) will live only a few months longer, po pal’tzam (finger counting):
Would she write? Oh, she did! Oh, every old thing turned out superfine! Fancy raced fact in never-ending rivalry and girl giggles. Andrey lived only a few months longer, po pal’tzam (finger counting) one, two, three, four — say, five. Andrey was doing fine by the spring of nineteen six or seven, with a comfortably collapsed lung and a straw-colored beard (nothing like facial vegetation to keep a patient busy). Life forked and reforked. Yes, she told him. He insulted Van on the mauve-painted porch of a Douglas hotel where Van was awaiting his Ada in a final version of Les Enfants Maudits. Monsieur de Tobak (an earlier cuckold) and Lord Erminin (a second-time second) witnessed the duel in the company of a few tall yuccas and short cactuses. Vinelander wore a cutaway (he would); Van, a white suit. Neither man wished to take any chances, and both fired simultaneously. Both fell. Mr Cutaway’s bullet struck the outsole of Van’s left shoe (white, black-heeled), tripping him and causing a slight fourmillement (excited ants) in his foot — that was all. Van got his adversary plunk in the underbelly — a serious wound from which he recovered in due time, if at all (here the forking swims in the mist). Actually it was all much duller. (3.8)
In a letter of May 27, 1826, to Vyazemski Pushkin uses the phrase schitayu po pal’tzam (I count by fingers):
Ты прав, любимец муз, — воспользуюсь правами блудного зятя и грядущего барина и письмом улажу всё дело. Должен ли я тебе что-нибудь или нет? отвечай. Но взял ли с тебя чего-нибудь мой человек, которого отослал я от себя за дурной тон и дурное поведение? Пора бы нам отослать и Булгарина, и «Благонамеренного», и Полевого, друга нашего. Теперь не до того, а, ей-богу, когда-нибудь примусь за журнал. Жаль мне, что с Катениным ты никак не ладишь. А для журнала — он находка. Читал я в газетах, что Lancelot в Петербурге, чёрт ли в нем? читал я также, что 30 словесников давали ему обед. Кто эти бессмертные? Считаю по пальцам и не досчитаюсь. Когда приедешь в Петербург, овладей этим Lancelot (которого я ни стишка не помню) и не пускай его по кабакам отечественной словесности. Мы в сношениях с иностранцами не имеем ни гордости, ни стыда — при англичанах дурачим Василья Львовича; пред M-me de Staël заставляем Милорадовича отличаться в мазурке. Русский барин кричит: мальчик! забавляй Гекторку (датского кобеля). Мы хохочем и переводим эти барские слова любопытному путешественнику. Всё это попадает в его журнал и печатается в Европе — это мерзко. Я, конечно, презираю отечество мое с головы до ног — но мне досадно, если иностранец разделяет со мною это чувство. Ты, который не на привязи, как можешь ты оставаться в России? Если царь даст мне свободу, то я месяца не останусь. Мы живем в печальном веке, но когда воображаю Лондон, чугунные дороги, паровые корабли, английские журналы или парижские театры и - - - - - - - — то мое глухое Михайловское наводит на меня тоску и бешенство. В 4-ой песне «Онегина» я изобразил свою жизнь; когда-нибудь прочтешь его и спросишь с милою улыбкой: где ж мой поэт? в нем дарование приметно — услышишь, милая, в ответ: он удрал в Париж и никогда в проклятую Русь не воротится — ай-да умница.
Pushkin tells Vyazemski that he will write a penitential letter to the father of a serf girl whom he impregnated and whom in an earlier letter to Vyazemski Pushkin calls moya Eda ("my Eda"), after the title character of a long poem by Baratynski. In the closing lines of his epigram on an aged virgin, Khotite l' znat' vse tainstva lyubvi... ("Do you Want to Know All Secrets of Love?" 1827), Baratynski plays on the phrase po pal'tzam (in detail):
Хотите ль знать все таинства любви?
Послушайте девицу пожилую:
Какой огонь она родит в крови!
Какую власть дарует поцелую!
Какой язык пылающим очам!
Как миг один рассудок побеждает:
По пальцам всё она расскажет вам.
— Ужели всё она по пальцам знает?
In the postscript of his letter to Vyazemski Pushkin says that it sad that he will not bid adieux to the Karamzins:
Думаю, что ты уже в Петербурге, и это письмо туда отправится. Грустно мне, что не прощусь с Карамзиными — бог знает, свидимся ли когда-нибудь. Я теперь во Пскове, и молодой доктор спьяна сказал мне, что без операции я не дотяну до 30 лет. Незабавно умереть в Опоческом уезде.
When he wrote his letter to Vyazemski, Pushkin (who lived in exile in Mikhaylovskoe, his parents' estate in the Province of Pskov) did not yet know that N. M. Karamzin (who was ill and was going abroad) had died in St. Petersburg on May 22, 1826.
Describing his travels in childhood, Van pairs Karamzin with Tolstoy:
After that, they tried to settle whether their ways had merged somewhere or run closely parallel for a bit that year in Europe. In the spring of 1881, Van, aged eleven, spent a few months with his Russian tutor and English valet at his grandmother’s villa near Nice, while Demon was having a much better time in Cuba than Dan was at Mocuba. In June, Van was taken to Florence, and Rome, and Capri, where his father turned up for a brief spell. They parted again, Demon sailing back to America, and Van with his tutor going first to Gardone on Lake Garda, where Aksakov reverently pointed out Goethe’s and d’Annunzio’s marble footprints, and then staying for a while in autumn at a hotel on a mountain slope above Leman Lake (where Karamzin and Count Tolstoy had roamed). Did Marina suspect that Van was somewhere in the same general area as she throughout 1881? Probably no. Both girls had scarlet fever in Cannes, while Marina was in Spain with her Grandee. After carefully matching memories, Van and Ada concluded that it was not impossible that somewhere along a winding Riviera road they passed each other in rented victorias that both remembered were green, with green-harnessed horses, or perhaps in two different trains, going perhaps the same way, the little girl at the window of one sleeping car looking at the brown sleeper of a parallel train which gradually diverged toward sparkling stretches of sea that the little boy could see on the other side of the tracks. The contingency was too mild to be romantic, nor did the possibility of their having walked or run past each other on the quay of a Swiss town afford any concrete thrill. But as Van casually directed the searchlight of backthought into that maze of the past where the mirror-lined narrow paths not only took different turns, but used different levels (as a mule-drawn cart passes under the arch of a viaduct along which a motor skims by), he found himself tackling, in still vague and idle fashion, the science that was to obsess his mature years — problems of space and time, space versus time, time-twisted space, space as time, time as space — and space breaking away from time, in the final tragic triumph of human cogitation: I am because I die. (1.24)
According to Van, nothing in world literature, save maybe Count Tolstoy’s reminiscences, can vie in pure joyousness and Arcadian innocence with the ‘Ardis’ part of Ada:
Ardis Hall — the Ardors and Arbors of Ardis — this is the leitmotiv rippling through Ada, an ample and delightful chronicle, whose principal part is staged in a dream-bright America — for are not our childhood memories comparable to Vineland-born caravelles, indolently encircled by the white birds of dreams? The protagonist, a scion of one of our most illustrious and opulent families, is Dr Van Veen, son of Baron ‘Demon’ Veen, that memorable Manhattan and Reno figure. The end of an extraordinary epoch coincides with Van’s no less extraordinary boyhood. Nothing in world literature, save maybe Count Tolstoy’s reminiscences, can vie in pure joyousness and Arcadian innocence with the ‘Ardis’ part of the book. On the fabulous country estate of his art-collecting uncle, Daniel Veen, an ardent childhood romance develops in a series of fascinating scenes between Van and pretty Ada, a truly unusual gamine, daughter of Marina, Daniel’s stage-struck wife. That the relationship is not simply dangerous cousinage, but possesses an aspect prohibited by law, is hinted in the very first pages. (5.6)
After Van’s and Ada’s death, Mr. Ronald Oranger (old Van’s secretary, the editor of Ada) marries Violet Knox (old Van’s typist whom Ada calls Fialochka). Van does not realize that Andrey Vinelander and Ada have at least two children and that Ronald Oranger and Violet Knox are Ada’s grandchildren.
According to Ada, she saw the verse “far enough, fair enough” in small violet letters before Van put it into orange ones:
They walked through a grove and past a grotto.
Ada said: ‘Officially we are maternal cousins, and cousins can marry by special decree, if they promise to sterilize their first five children. But, moreover, the father-in-law of my mother was the brother of your grandfather. Right?’
‘That’s what I’m told,’ said Van serenely.
‘Not sufficiently distant,’ she mused, ‘or is it?’
‘Far enough, fair enough.’
‘Funny — I saw that verse in small violet letters before you put it into orange ones — just one second before you spoke. Spoke, smoke. Like the puff preceding a distant cannon shot.’
‘Physically,’ she continued, ‘we are more like twins than cousins, and twins or even siblings can’t marry, of course, or will be jailed and "altered," if they persevere.’
‘Unless,’ said Van, ‘they are specially decreed cousins.’ (1.24)
In the same chapter Van describes his travels in childhood and mentions Karamzin and Count Tolstoy.
Po pal'tzam (finger counting) also brings to mind chitaem po skladam (we spell it out), a phrase used by Karamzin in his epigram on life (Dec. 31, 1797):
Что наша жизнь? Роман. — Кто автор? Аноним.
Читаем по складам, смеёмся, плачем... спим.
Life? A romance. By whom? Anonymous.
We spell it out; it makes us laugh and weep,
And then put us
To sleep.
See also the updated version of my previous post: “Repburg in Pale Fire.”